How the Discourse of Major Powers Intersects with Managed Peace, Rumor Factories, and the Role of Artificial Intelligence as a Tool of Power

Prepared and Analyzed | BETH

Introduction: The Battle Is No Longer on the Ground

What we are witnessing today is not an escalation of crises,
but a transformation in how they are managed.

Major powers are no longer acting solely to extinguish fires,
nor merely to contain conflicts after they erupt.
They have moved to a deeper level:

Managing perception before a crisis is even born.

Here, three paths intersect with striking precision.

First: The Shift in the Discourse of Major Powers

From Crisis Management to Perception Management

In the past, the key questions were:

How do we manage war?
How do we extinguish a crisis?
How do we contain an explosion?

Today, the questions have changed to:

How do we shape understanding?
How do we redefine what constitutes a threat?
How do we decide what should anger people—and what they should ignore?

The discourse of major powers is no longer reactive,
but perceptive and preemptive.

Carefully calibrated statements,
deliberate leaks,
silence at certain moments,
and noise at others.

The objective is not merely a solution,
but controlling the angle of perception.

Second: Managed Peace in the Region

And Why It Disturbs Rumor Factories

The region is undergoing a clear transformation:

De-escalation without being framed as surrender,
Peace without being portrayed as weakness,
Paths managed quietly rather than through loud rhetoric.

This form of peace is managed:

It is not built on emotion,
nor on slogans,
but on precise balances of interests and awareness.

Here, the contradiction becomes evident.

With every step forward in the peace process:

Rumors intensify,
Noise escalates,
Old incitement rhetoric resurfaces.

Not because peace has failed,
but because there are those who are harmed by its success.

Third: Rumor Factories… Why Haven’t They Stopped?

The most important question is not:
Why do rumors spread?

But rather:
Why do they persist despite repeated failure?

The answer is simple:
Some actors no longer possess other tools.

Incitement no longer convinces,
Hostile discourse has become exposed,
Yet they continue to gamble on:

Fatigue,
Repetition,
Investment in temporary ignorance.

This inevitably leads us to the third path.

Fourth: Artificial Intelligence

From a Technical Tool to a Tool of Power

In this context, artificial intelligence is not the protagonist of the story,
but its most dangerous instrument.

The question is no longer:
What can AI do?

But rather:

Who feeds it?
Who controls its algorithms?
Who decides what appears—and what is hidden?

Today, AI:

Amplifies certain narratives,
Marginalizes others,
Reorders priorities of anger and empathy.

It is a tool for managing perceptual pathways,
not a neutral technology.

Where Do the Three Paths Converge?

Major powers manage perception.
The region manages peace.
Rumor factories attempt disruption.
And artificial intelligence is used to regulate the rhythm.

The result:

The battle is no longer on the ground,
but over how events on the ground are interpreted.

Whoever controls interpretation
can delay confrontation,
prevent it,
or redirect it.

BETH Reading

We are living in a phase where:

Violence decreases,
While the struggle over awareness intensifies.

Noise is not always a sign of danger;
sometimes it is a sign of confusion.

And rumors are no longer powerful weapons,
but side effects of their creators being exposed.

Conclusion

The three transformations are not separate,
but parts of a single picture:

Perception management replacing crisis management,
Peace managed quietly instead of open confrontation,
Artificial intelligence used to shape narratives.

In this phase:

Those who possess awareness are not easily drawn in.
Those who lack it amplify the noise.