Armageddon & The Crypt: From Myth to Massacre | Armageddon & Le Souterrain : Du mythe au massacre | Armagedón & La Cripta: Del mito a la masacre | ארמגדון והמרתף: ממיתוס לטבח

Prepared by: Strategic Media Department – BETH News Agency

While Netanyahu describes Palestinians and Arabs as “savages” and “terrorists,” he conveniently ignores that the very Zionist project is itself rooted in a metaphysical myth: the “Promised Land” and “Armageddon,” the apocalyptic battle upon which much of Judeo-Christian theology is constructed.
So, who is truly savage? The one demanding his rights on his land? Or the one justifying bloodshed and war through an “end-of-times” fantasy?

The Promised Land… A Religious Dream or a Colonial Project?

Jews did not choose Palestine by chance, but under the pretext of the myth of the “divine promise.”

When this myth is translated into politics, it becomes a justification for displacement, killing, and settlement.

The irony: Arabs are accused of “living in the past,” while the Israeli project itself is deeply buried in the ancient Torah past.

Armageddon… The End-Time Myth Governing the Present

Armageddon is a site in northern Palestine believed to be the stage of the “final battle” between good and evil.

Zionist thought – alongside American Christian Zionism – ties this myth to today’s political and military transformations.

Here, mythology turns into a “bloody roadmap”: every war is viewed as a prelude to the end.

The Crypt in Shi’ism… and Armageddon in Zionism

The “crypt” – according to Shi’a belief – is in Samarra, where it is said that the Mahdi will reappear at the end of times.

Armageddon: where it is said the decisive battle will take place at the end of times.

Both are metaphysical myths invested politically.

The difference: the Shi’a await a “savior,” while the Zionist project exploits Armageddon to justify current wars.

The Savagery of Imagination… When Myth Becomes a License to Kill

Is it not savagery to wage wars in reality to achieve an “imaginary prophecy”?

How can the victim be labeled as savage, while the executioner recycles ancient myths into state policy?

If the past is the justification, then what kind of future awaits humanity?

Between “the Crypt” and “Armageddon”

If Islam was revealed as one unified faith with one Qur’an, one Kaaba, and one Prophet, what came later of sectarian splits was not from the essence of religion, but from politics and power.
The Shi’a invented a crypt awaiting a savior, and the Zionists invented “Armageddon” to inflame wars in the name of the end.

🔹 The Core Point:
Neither Shi’ism represents Islam, nor Zionism represents the teachings of Moses or Jesus. Both were manufactured to be weaponized politically toward the same end: division, domination, and destruction.

Questions of Analysis

Political Relation:
Who influenced whom? Did the idea of “the crypt” precede “Armageddon,” or were both born from the same mindset: the mindset of manufacturing illusion and managing it as a political weapon?
What is clear is that both projects served – directly or indirectly – the purpose of suspending human awareness and tying people’s destinies to myths of the unseen.

Connection and Cooperation:
Is there a hidden thread linking the two doctrines behind the scenes?
Or is it that each side employs its myth in its own direction, yet both lead to the same outcome: destruction, killing, suppression of reason, and control through illusion?

BETH’s Concluding Commentary

Whoever contemplates can see that “the crypt” and “Armageddon” are two sides of the same coin:
A coin that kills humanity in the name of the unseen, and destroys the present in the name of an imagined future.

True Islam, and the true teachings of Judaism and Christianity, are innocent of this chaos.

The most dangerous question remains:
Will humanity be left hostage to these bloody myths?
Or has the time come to close the “crypt” and bury “Armageddon” forever?

BETH Final Note

The age run by myths is the age of true savagery.
Those who live on illusions of “the crypt” or “Armageddon” paralyze the present and kill the future.
The living nations, however, are those that connect meaning with reality, and build a future worthy of humanity – not of myths soaked in blood.

English
This report is available in multiple languages (summarized). You can read the full report in English above, and in Arabic via the link:
🔗 https://bethpress.com/News/Details/22340

Français
Ce rapport est disponible en plusieurs langues (version résumée). Vous pouvez lire le rapport complet en anglais ci-dessus, et en arabe via le lien :
🔗 https://bethpress.com/News/Details/22340

Español
Este informe está disponible en varios idiomas (resumido). Puede leer el informe completo en inglés arriba y en árabe a través del enlace:
🔗 https://bethpress.com/News/Details/22340

עברית (Hebrew)
הדוח זמין במספר שפות (בגרסה מקוצרת). ניתן לקרוא את הדוח המלא באנגלית למעלה, ובערבית דרך הקישור:
🔗 bit.ly/BETH-Arabic

🇫🇷 Français

Tandis que Netanyahou traite les Arabes de « barbares », il oublie que le sionisme repose sur des mythes apocalyptiques comme la « Terre promise » et « l’Armageddon ».
De même, l’idéologie chiite évoque le « souterrain » de Samarra. Ces mythes transforment la foi en arme politique.
La question demeure : projets distincts ou but commun — dominer par la peur et la destruction ?

Commentaire BETH :
Les civilisations se construisent par la raison, non par les mythes. Il est temps d’enterrer « Armageddon » et le « souterrain » pour sauver l’avenir.

🇪🇸 Español

Mientras Netanyahu llama “bárbaros” a los árabes, olvida que el sionismo mismo se basa en mitos apocalípticos como la “Tierra Prometida” y “Armagedón”.
De forma similar, la ideología chiita invoca la “cripta” de Samarra. Ambos mitos convierten la fe en arma política.
La pregunta sigue: ¿son proyectos separados o un mismo propósito — controlar mediante miedo y destrucción?

Comentario BETH:
La razón, no los mitos, construye civilizaciones. La humanidad debe enterrar tanto “Armagedón” como la “cripta” para proteger su futuro.

🇮🇱 עברית (Hebrew)

בעוד נתניהו מכנה את הערבים "ברברים", הוא שוכח שהציונות עצמה מבוססת על מיתוסים אפוקליפטיים כמו "ארץ המובטחת" ו"ארמגדון".
באופן דומה, האידיאולוגיה השיעית מזכירה את "המרתף" בסאמרא. שני המיתוסים הופכים את האמונה לנשק פוליטי.
השאלה היא: האם אלה פרויקטים נפרדים או מטרה אחת — שליטה באמצעות פחד והרס?

הערת BETH:
תרבויות בנויות על תבונה, לא על מיתוסים. הגיע הזמן לקבור את "ארמגדון" ואת "המרתף" כדי לשמור על עתיד האנושות.