Beth: With the meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors approaching, the Iranian regime's nuclear crisis intensifies, and warnings about the consequences of the mullahs' rebellion are increasing.

The Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Grossi, asked to travel to Iran to clarify the ambiguity in the regime's nuclear program, but the regime has not yet responded.

In a press conference (Monday, 6 September), Khatibzadeh, a spokesman for the regime's Foreign Ministry, responded to a question about this, describing Grossi's possible visit to Tehran as a "political use of a technical context." It is a response that expresses the regime's fear of the repercussions of this trip. 

 

In his televised address (September 4), Raisi attempted to keep the international community at bay with the usual split over the regime's final position on the Vienna talks. He said, "The issue of dialogue is on the agenda and will be followed up, but neither dialogue for the sake of dialogue nor negotiation for the sake of negotiation; rather, negotiations aimed at achieving results, that is, seeking to lift sanctions."

Thus, the Iranian regime is still considering lifting the sanctions without paying a price and returning the situation to what it was five years ago when it was signed. A goal that has no serious defender even within the system. Because everyone knows that the situation 5 years ago can never be returned to because all circumstances and the balance of political forces have changed.

"The Iranian regime continues to expand its nuclear activities, calling into question efforts to revive the nuclear deal," the Wall Street Journal said. 

 

She added: "The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency warned that without monitoring equipment, the agency will move "in a hazy environment" in assessing whether the Iranian regime is diverting nuclear materials and equipment for illegal uses.

In this regard, Gharibabadi, the regime's representative at the International Atomic Energy Agency, said: "The agency is seeking to exaggerate the situation under pressure from some of its own members." He added: "No one can demand the cessation of nuclear activities from the regime within the framework of an agreement." Agency members must refrain from lobbying for political purposes.

The French Foreign Ministry wrote in its briefing on September 6, 2021: France, with its international partners, supports the IAEA's actions under the safeguards agreement with Iran, as well as the professional and impartial efforts of the IAEA and its teams to clarify specific questions regarding Iran's statements and nuclear status.

The French Foreign Ministry stressed that Iran (the regime) must immediately provide complete and correct technical explanations for the questions raised by the International Atomic Energy Agency about the presence of undeclared nuclear materials in Iran. 

 

In fact, the regime has yet to provide a definitive answer to the 5+1 group on the JCPOA, and has not resolved the IAEA's ambiguities and questions despite the passage of seven months since the start of the nuclear talks in Vienna and after months of discussions with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

In such a case, the report given by Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, to some diplomats and members of the International Atomic Energy Agency's Board of Governors, was leaked to news agencies and the media.

The report cited the "obstacles placed" by the regime in the nuclear talks, creating problems in monitoring nuclear sites, expanding nuclear activities, and preventing IAEA inspectors from accessing nuclear sites, stressing that the regime "impedes IAEA investigations" and made "efforts The efforts made to revive the nuclear deal are questionable.

On September 8, the US and German foreign ministers warned the mullahs' regime in a joint press conference that it would continue to violate the nuclear deal.

Blinken said the situation is "close to the point where a return to compliance with the JCPOA will not yield the benefits that the nuclear deal has brought." Referring to a previous statement by the mullahs' foreign minister that the regime may return to the nuclear agreement talks from two to three months, the German foreign minister said that "this position on our part can be interpreted that there are other plans for the nuclear agreement in Iran," which is a sign of the regime's intention making a nuclear weapon.

The situation is so sensitive that even Russia is talking to the regime on a warning note. Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov called on the mullahs to "demonstrate a good understanding of the resumption of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency."

"With Iran continuing its nuclear program and halting talks, hope is fading," Politico wrote on September 9, referring to the Iranian regime's breach of its commitments and the IAEA report. 

 

The International Atomic Energy Agency added: "As nuclear negotiators from Iran, the United States and other world powers delay a return to the negotiating table in the Austrian capital, bad news is piling up and rhetoric becomes more pessimistic."

Thus, a global consensus began to be formed against the regime regarding its nuclear program, despite the strong conciliatory desire and even the approach of the current US administration, which promised to return to the nuclear agreement since the elections, and after attending the White House, entered the Vienna talks to revive the agreement.

This is the same warning that the Iranian Resistance issued to the world three decades ago - that by adopting a principled national policy, they put a serious obstacle to the secret nuclear project of the mullahs' regime and which is against the interest of the country. Its proponents pushed him to accept the risks.