Broadcast - Report on the Iranian Resistance:

The ongoing negotiations in Vienna to revive the nuclear agreement have not yielded tangible results yet, as some stakeholders have said that “the results of this conference are still unclear,” but inside the regime there is a strange clamor raised about it, to the point that the regime’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in its capacity as the sponsor of the talks, issued A statement complaining about what it called the "rival gang", which "did everything in its power to target (the Vienna negotiators)". The statement carried a title that speaks for itself: "They are very united and we are scattered."

Indeed, such a disagreement is unprecedented in this system, which was inconsistent from the first day and was the scene of conflicts and clashes between the rival regime's gangs, while each gang places its interests as a priority in these conflicts.

Media outlets are at the forefront as tools and weapons in this war, as these media have become arenas of confrontation in which the two sides make accusations and attributes against each other, such as spies, tramps, or foreign businessmen.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry's statement, referring to some films and series produced by the dominant gang to discredit the other side, said, "The movement that in recent weeks, coinciding with the talks in Vienna, has targeted representatives of the regime every night and describes the negotiating team as a group that is intrusive and naive, portraying them as being." Composers of foreign research centers, and in the 1911 agreement he compares them to traitorous Qajar statesmen. "

On the other hand, the statement added: "The English-language radio and television network, which should be the unified voice of the regime, distorts the negotiators' reputation before the opposite party with purely domestic political goals and undermines the regime's diplomatic efforts, and the statement says: Do not play with the credibility of the regime."

"Even a second" Why?

Before issuing this statement; Speaking at a cabinet meeting on Wednesday April 21, Rouhani said, referring to the screening of films that "didn't help them" and while he barely managed to control his anger, "We don't waste a second of this and that." It has no effect on us, we framed (Khamenei). We move in this context, and never waste a second. "

From Rouhani's words it becomes clear why such turmoil and conflicts occur within the system, according to Rouhani, who is of course supported by Khamenei, as a matter of seconds becomes important to him, in other words, the regime has reached a dead end as a result of sanctions and many economic and social crises that accumulate like raging rivers and explosive contradictions in the system.

Of course, this predicament is not limited to Rouhani and his gang, but those anxious also feel that if they fall short, they will lose control.

All this haste in the regime, especially after the severe military strike that resulted in damage to the prestige the regime received in Natanz, has significance and shows the regime's severe impotence.

On that issue, Abdullah Kanji, editor-in-chief of the Joan newspaper (affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards) wrote on his Twitter account, referring to the same meaning, by saying: “If I were influential in the regime’s decisions after the recent sabotage in Natanz, I would have ordered the cancellation of the Vienna talks, what does it mean Sabotage, when we commit to return and closure?

It is important to consider the phrase "obligation to back down" in statements of this element, and its many implications can be clearly seen in all of Rouhani's statements these days.

But the one who "works" in this system and takes "regime decisions" is currently silent after agreeing to the negotiations, just like the first nuclear agreement, because he knows that any clear statement at this stage breaches the fragile internal balance of the regime and the situation could get out of control.

But the question is: How far can Khamenei continue this double game and play on the ropes in this storm of successive events?