✍️ Analytical Report by the Strategic Media Department | BETH Agency

Introduction:
U.S. President Donald Trump’s decisions to raise tariffs—most notably by 125% on China—were not just economic policy moves, but a major shock that rattled global financial markets and disrupted the calculations of both allies and adversaries.

And if some still believe the world remains in a state of “economic peace,” they should think again:

“The world is living through a hybrid war… economic on the surface, military in the shadows, and technological at its core.”

Were Trump’s decisions calculated?
Yes—but according to his own playbook. President Trump does not follow traditional economic analysis. He adheres to one core principle:

“Shock everyone… then negotiate from above.”

Tariffs, for him, are not just financial tools—they are pressure cards used to assert dominance and disorient opponents.

🌍 Global Reactions… Expected or Not?

Partially, yes. But their intensity and speed exceeded expectations:

More than 10 countries expressed formal discontent.

Global markets fluctuated sharply.

Economic dialogue quickly morphed into a muffled political crisis.

Only China responded forcefully:

Angry statements.

Hints at counter-sanctions.

Threats to take the matter to the World Trade Organization.

🇺🇸 Protests in the U.S.… Reality or Exaggerated?

Yes, actual protests occurred in New York, Chicago, and Atlanta.
Led by labor unions, students, and left-wing activists.
Opposition media is amplifying the events—but not without basis.

The American public is divided:
Between those who see the tariffs as economic protection…
…and those who see them as playing with fire.

Has Trump proposed solutions?
His approach is well-known:

He triggers the decision.

Observes reactions.

Then presents himself as the dealmaker.

But this style carries real risks:

Supply chain disruptions

Capital flight

Loss of trust in U.S. economic leadership

🔮 Potential Scenarios:

Smart De-escalation:

Behind-the-scenes negotiations

Gradual reduction of tariffs

Domestic compensation for U.S. companies

Gradual Trade Escalation:

More retaliatory action from China

Involvement of other nations in the tariff war

A “Trump-style” surprise deal:

One-on-one agreement with China

Declaration of a negotiation victory

🧠 Final BETH Insight:

What is happening today is not just an economic dispute—
It is a global test of dominance frameworks and economic sovereignty.

“The world isn’t heading into a war… it’s already in one—just in a new language.”

📌 BETH Addendum:

Trump’s style, summarized as:
“Shock everyone… then negotiate from above”
Is not merely a policy—
It is a confrontational negotiation tactic based on surprising the opponent, disorienting them, then imposing terms from a position of dominance.

✅ What some might consider a success:

Domestically: Trump appears as a “strongman” leader, appealing to voters who want results over diplomacy.

Economically: He has rattled trade rivals and reshaped agreements—like with China and the USMCA with Canada and Mexico.

Politically: He fosters strategic ambiguity that pressures opponents into concessions.

❌ But on the other hand:

Many world leaders don’t see this as mutual respect—but as diplomatic bullying.

The tactic of “announce first, backtrack conditionally” has made some nations lose trust in U.S. commitments.

Acting from a “high platform” without regard for smaller nations' sensitivities may weaken alliances and push some allies toward Beijing and Moscow.

🖼️ Visual Analysis – by BETH:

The pensive figure: Symbolizes the global decision-maker, contemplating a worrying rise.

The upward arrow: Not economic growth—but a spike in tension.

The data bars: Represent pillars of economic confrontation.

The map: A reminder that this affects everyone.

The fractured image of China: A smart visual metaphor for the conflict.

✍️ BETH Summary:

“He who shocks the world may confuse it… but he who disrespects it will lose it.”
Cleverness does not equal arrogance.
Winning in negotiations doesn’t mean ignoring global values of equality and respect.

And perhaps the bigger question is:

How many times can you surprise the world… before it builds immunity against you?